A eficácia da terlipressina versus adrenalina na ressuscitação cardiopulmonar em suínos / The efficacy of terlipressin versus adrenaline in swine cardiopulmonary resuscitation / La eficacia de la terlipresina versus adrenalina en la resucitación cardiopulmonar en cerdos

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a eficácia da terlipressina (TP) versus adrenalina (ADR) em aumentar a pressão de perfusão coronariana (PPC) e o retorno da circulação espontânea (RCE) na RCP em suínos. MÉTODOS: Sob anestesia cetamina/tiopental, induziu-se fibrilação ventricular em 44 porcos fêmeas imaturos, permanecendo não assistida por 10 min, seguidos de 2 min de RCP-manual (100 compressões/10 ventilações/min com ar). Os animais foram então alocados em quatro grupos, recebendo: 1) ADR (45 µg.kg-1); 2) salina-placebo (10 mL); 3) TP (20 µg.kg-1); 4) TP (20 µg.kg-1) + ADR (45 µg.kg-1). Desfibrilação foi realizada 2 min após, observando-se os animais sobreviventes por um período de 30 min. ECG, PA sistêmica, PAD e PetCO2 foram monitorados continuamente. RESULTADOS: A TP não diferiu do placebo quanto aos efeitos na PPC, com baixas taxas de RCE em ambos os grupos (1/11 vs.2/11; p = NS). A ADR aumentou a PPC de 13 ± 12 para 54 ± 15 mmHg (p < 0,0001), efeito similar a TP + ADR (de 21 ± 10 para 45 ± 13 mmHg; p < 0,0001), com altas taxas de RCE/sobreviventes em ambos os grupos (10/11 vs.9/11, respectivamente). Entre os sobreviventes, maior PAM foi observada no grupo TP + ADR vs.ADR (105 ± 19 mmHg vs.76 ± 21 mmHg; p = 0,0157). CONCLUSÕES: ADR e TP + ADR foram efetivas para aumentar a PPC/RCE neste modelo experimental, mas a TP, isolada, não foi diferente do placebo. Contudo, nos animais sobreviventes do grupo TP + ADR observou-se maior estabilidade hemodinâmica após a RCE, sugerindo que a TP possa ser uma medicação útil no manuseio da hipotensão pós-RCP.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of terlipressin (TP) vs.adrenaline (ADR) in increasing coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in swine CPR. METHODS: Under anesthesia with ketamine/thiopental, ventricular fibrillation was induced in 44 female immature pigs, remaining unassisted for 10 minutes, followed by 2 minutes of manual CPR (100 compression/10 ventilations/min with air). Animals were, then, divided into four groups: 1) ADR (45 µg.kg-1); 2) saline-placebo (10 mL); 3) TP 20 µg.kg-1); and TP (20 µg.kg-1) + ADR (45 µg.kg-1). Defibrillation was performed after 2 minutes, observing surviving animals for a 30-minute period. Electrocardiogram, systemic BP, DBP, and PetCO2 were monitored continuously. RESULTS: Terlipressin did not differ from placebo regarding the effects on CPP, with low rates of ROSC in both groups (1/11 vs.2/11; p = NS). Adrenaline increased CPP from 13 ± 12 to 54 ± 15 mmHg (p < 0.0001), similar effect to TP + ADR (from 21 ± 10 to 45 ± 13 mmHg; p < 0.0001), with high rates of ROSC/survivors in both groups (10/11 vs.9/11, respectively). Among survivors, greater MAP was observed in the TP + ADR group vs.ADR (105 ± 19 mmHg vs.76 ± 21 mmHg; p = 0.0157) groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adrenaline and TP + ADR were effective on maintaining CPP/ROSC in this experimental model, but isolated TP did not differ from placebo. However, in surviving animals in the TP + ADR group, greater hemodynamic stability was observed after ROSC, suggesting that TP can be a useful medication in the management of post-CPR hypotension.

JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVOS: El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la eficacia de la terlipresina (TP) versus adrenalina (ADR) en aumentar la presión de perfusión coronaria (PPC) y el retorno de la circulación espontánea (RCE) en la RCP en cerdos. MÉTODOS: Bajo la anestesia ketamina/tiopental, se indujo la fibrilación ventricular en 44 cerdos hembras no adultos, permaneciendo no asistida por 10 min, seguidos de 2 min de RCP-manual (100 compresiones/10 ventilaciones/min con aire). Los animales se ubicaron entonces en cuatro grupos, recibiendo: 1) ADR (45 µg.kg-1); 2) salina-placebo (10 mL); 3) TP (20 µg.kg-1); 4) TP (20 µg.kg-1) + ADR (45 µg.kg-1). La desfibrilación fue realizada 2 min después, haciendo el seguimiento de los animales sobrevivientes por un período de 30 min. ECG, PA sistémica, PAD y PetCO2 fueron monitorizados continuamente. RESULTADOS: La TP no fue diferente del placebo en cuanto a los efectos en la PPC, con bajas tasas de RCE en ambos grupos (1/11 vs.2/11; p = NS). La ADR aumentó la PPC de 13 ± 12 para 54 ± 15 mmHg (p < 0,0001), efecto similar a TP + ADR (de 21 ± 10 para 45 ± 13 mmHg; p < 0,0001), con altas tasas de RCE/supervivientes en ambos grupos (10/11 vs.9/11, respectivamente). Entre los supervivientes, se observó una mayor PAM en el grupo TP + ADR vs.ADR (105 ± 19 mmHg vs.76 ± 21 mmHg; p = 0,0157). CONCLUSIONES: La ADR y TP + ADR fueron efectivas para aumentar la PPC/RCE en este modelo experimental, pero la TP aislada, no fue diferente del placebo. Sin embargo, en los animales supervivientes del grupo TP + ADR, vimos una mayor estabilidad hemodinámica después de la RCE, lo que nos indica que la TP puede ser una medicación útil en el manejo de la hipotensión post-RCP.

The efficacy of terlipressin versus adrenaline in swine cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of terlipressin (TP) vs. adrenaline (ADR) in increasing coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in swine CPR. METHODS: Under anesthesia with ketamine/thiopental, ventricular fibrillation was induced in 44 female immature pigs, remaining unassisted for 10 minutes, followed by 2 minutes of manual CPR (100 compression/10 ventilations/min with air). Animals were, then, divided into four groups: 1) ADR (45µg.kg(-1)); 2) saline-placebo (10mL); 3) TP 20µg.kg(-1)); and TP (20µg.kg(-1)) + ADR (45µg.kg(-1)). Defibrillation was performed after 2 minutes, observing surviving animals for a 30-minute period. Electrocardiogram, systemic BP, DBP, and PetCO(2) were monitored continuously. RESULTS: Terlipressin did not differ from placebo regarding the effects on CPP, with low rates of ROSC in both groups (1/11 vs. 2/11; p=NS). Adrenaline increased CPP from 13±12 to 54±15mmHg (p<0.0001), similar effect to TP + ADR (from 21±10 to 45±13mmHg; p<0.0001), with high rates of ROSC/survivors in both groups (10/11 vs. 9/11, respectively). Among survivors, greater MAP was observed in the TP + ADR group vs. ADR (105±19mmHg vs. 76±21mmHg; p=0.0157) groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adrenaline and TP + ADR were effective on maintaining CPP/ROSC in this experimental model, but isolated TP did not differ from placebo. However, in surviving animals in the TP + ADR group, greater hemodynamic stability was observed after ROSC, suggesting that TP can be a useful medication in the management of post-CPR hypotension.